#SistersInLaw
NFL v. Flores, Election Interference & Vindman’s Lawsuit
February 5, 2022
In This Episode:
The #SistersInLaw meet this week to explain the NFL vs Flores case, the ‘but for’ requirement in discrimination cases, and to emphasize the value of diversity across all levels of an organization. Then, they look at the latest developments in holding Donald accountable for his attempts to interfere in the 2020 election, and Alexander Vindman’s lawsuit against members of his team.
Read this week’s transcript.
Get #SistersInLaw Merch
For our just released ethically sourced clothes, pins and more, support the #SistersInLaw by picking up our new merch items at the Politicon Merch Store.
Email the sisters at SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or tweet using #SistersInLaw.
Content Recommended By The #Sisters
From Kim: On President Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court
From Barb: On why it’s not racist to commit to nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court
Mentioned by Jill: Jonathan Greenblatt discusses Whoopi’s holocaust comments on the view
David Baddiel on the Whoopi controversy
Links To This Week’s Sponsors
Hello Fresh: For up to 16 free meals and 3 free gifts, go to hellofresh.com and use the promo code: SISTERS16
Frame Bridge: For 15% off your first order, go to framebridge.com and use the promo code: SISTERS
Magic Spoon: For $5 off your next purchase of delicious Magic Spoon cereal, go to magicspoon.com and use the promo code: SISTER
Blinkist: For a 7 day free trial and 25% off a premium membership go to blinkist.com
Get More From The #Sisters In Law
Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC
Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President
Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR
Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC